[pptp-server] FW: PPTP. PAP. and the compaq Microcom.

[Matthew Ramsay]

> > therefore, we act as a PAC and don't have to implement message type 9
> > incoming.
> 
> well, technically we don't HAVE to implement those messages, but it's a
> pretty easy hack, and obviously SOME clinets are confused about how things
> work, so wy not support them? I dont think there are any security problems
> with implementing those 3 control types, so I say we do it.


Since the PPTP client and server are somewhat similar... would there be
any disadvantages to rolling PPTP client support into PoPToP? pppd acts
as both a client and a server.. why not poptop? maybe a compile option?
any comments/issues?

Cheers,
Matt.