[pptp-server] poptop with mppe on solaris 2.6

[Huy NGUYEN]

Hi,

I think this question has already been posted to the listed but I could not
find an answer in the archives.
I'm trying to set up a poptop server on solaris 2.6 but I can't get
encryption to work although unencrypted connections work.

I get these lines in logs:

Nov 27 11:04:29 host pppd[2282]: MSCHAP-v2 peer authentication succeeded for
huy
...
Nov 27 11:04:29 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x3 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:29 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x4]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host last message repeated 2 times
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x4 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x5]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x4 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host last message repeated 1 time
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x5 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x6]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x6 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x7]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x7 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x8]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x8 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x9]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x9 <mppe 0 0 0 0>]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0xa]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pptpd[2281]: CTRL: Received PPTP Control Message (type:
15)
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pptpd[2281]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO packet with
real ACCMs!
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pptpd[2281]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO packet with
real ACCMs!
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x9
"k\37777777751\002g\000<\37777777715t\000\000\002\37777777746"]
Nov 27 11:04:35 host pppd[2282]: LCP terminated by peer
(kM-i^Bg^@<M-Mt^@^@^BM-f)

My understanding is that the client and the server can not negotiate the
encryption thing. Am I right ?

Best regards,

Huy NGUYEN