[pptp-server] Failed CCP on linux-2.4.9/MS VPN 128-bit

Allan Clark allanc at caldera.com
Mon Nov 12 15:11:47 CST 2001


Charlie;

I think that's what it's saying: the MSVPN seems to be acknowledging the
offer from the linux side of mppe 1 0 0 60, but the linux side doesn't
seem to expect this ack, as indicated by the following log message from
the full trace:

> > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mppe 1 0 0 71>]
> > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: sent [CCP ConfNak id=0x2 <mppe 1 0 0 60>]
> > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2]
> > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: Received bad configure-ack: 
> > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: local  IP address 192.168.55.1
> > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: remote IP address 192.168.55.2

There are people on this list who claim to have a 128-bit functioning,
so I'm wondering if they receive the same log messages.

Allan



Charlie Brady wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Allan Clark wrote:
> 
> > Linux: req a config
> > MSVPN: <mppe 1 0 0 71>
> > Linux: no <mppe 1 0 0 71>, how about <mppe 1 0 0 60>
> > MSVPN: ok
> > Linux: huh?  (Received bad configure-ack)
> 
> Should the "ok" have been "ok, mppe 1 0 0 60"?
> 
> i.e.
> 
> > > > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2]
> > > > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mppe 1 0 0 71>]
> > > > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: sent [CCP ConfNak id=0x2 <mppe 1 0 0 60>]
> > > > Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2]
> 
> Nov 12 15:04:21 grinder pppd[13795]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mppe 1 0 0 60>]
> 
> --
> 
> Charlie Brady                         charlieb at e-smith.com
> Lead Product Developer
> Network Server Solutions Group        http://www.e-smith.com/
> Mitel Networks Corporation            http://www.mitel.com/
> Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000  Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739



More information about the pptp-server mailing list