[pptp-server] MPPE 128 Bit Compression?? What happen to Encryption???

lists at earthling.2y.net lists at earthling.2y.net
Tue Jan 15 23:10:12 CST 2002


Sorry, No, I don't have the patch.  But, you could just delete the other
cases in the pppd source, and make the default case to drop the conn with
the desired error message.


 On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jerry Vonau wrote:

> Hey All:
>
> I was able to duplicate the "receive" problem.
>
> I was using a linux client that had the mppe
> support, but didn't state that on the command
> line or on the options file.
>
> So there is something else to watch out for when
> using the linux client....
>
> On a different note, anybody have a require
> encryption patch for 2.4.1?
>
> Jerry Vonau
>
> Charlie Brady wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 lists at earthling.2y.net wrote:
> >
> > > For mppe stateless to work, I think (its been a while), you have to have
> > > both sides supporting mppe for it to work at all because the next
> >
> > You always need both sides supporting mppe for it to work.
> >
> > The central issue here though is whether encryption is used in one
> > direction or in both. Usually you will want both.
> >
> > > packet's encryption is based off the previous packet.  I may be wrong, as
> > > I said its been a while.  That is why when you start loosing packets with
> > > stateless, the ppp session has to stop and renegotiate encryption.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Monday 14 January 2002 04:20 pm, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > > Hey all:
> > > > > >>MPPE 128 bit, stateless receive compression enabled<<
> > > > >
> > > > > Is the receive part not an error?? That would suggest
> > > > > that encryption is for receive only, not transmit....
> > > > >
> > > > > Should it not be:
> > > > >
> > > > > MPPE 128 bit, stateless compression enabled
> >
> > It depends entirely on what is negotiated, which in turn depends entirely
> > on the options selected at each end of the link.
> >
> > Here is the relevant code; as you can see there are three different
> > possibilities:
> >
> > ...
> >     ccp_flags_set(f->unit, 1, 1);
> >     if (ANY_COMPRESS(*go)) {
> >         if (ANY_COMPRESS(*ho)) {
> >             if (go->method == ho->method) {
> >                 notice("%s compression enabled", method_name(go, ho));
> >             } else {
> >                 strlcpy(method1, method_name(go, NULL), sizeof(method1));
> >                 notice("%s / %s compression enabled",
> >                        method1, method_name(ho, NULL));
> >             }
> >         } else
> >             notice("%s receive compression enabled", method_name(go, NULL));
> >     } else if (ANY_COMPRESS(*ho))
> >         notice("%s transmit compression enabled", method_name(ho, NULL));
> > ...
> >
> > --
> > Charlie Brady                         charlieb at e-smith.com
> > Lead Product Developer
> > Network Server Solutions Group        http://www.e-smith.com/
> > Mitel Networks Corporation            http://www.mitel.com/
> > Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000  Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pptp-server maillist  -  pptp-server at lists.schulte.org
> > http://lists.schulte.org/mailman/listinfo/pptp-server
> > --- To unsubscribe, go to the url just above this line. --
> _______________________________________________
> pptp-server maillist  -  pptp-server at lists.schulte.org
> http://lists.schulte.org/mailman/listinfo/pptp-server
> --- To unsubscribe, go to the url just above this line. --
>

-- 
Justin Kreger, MCP MCSE CCNA
jkreger at earthling.2y.net jwkreger at uncg.edu justin at wss.net





More information about the pptp-server mailing list